Commonwealth v. Scott

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Scott

9 A.3d 1136, 607 Pa. 625, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2855

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 7, 2010·No. 414 EAL 2010·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of December 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Where a condition of petitioner’s house arrest was that he not “communicate with” fellow members of a gang, was not there insufficient evidence that petitioner violated that condition by merely identifying himself as a gang member on his MySpace page and posting therein the message “Free Quil and Joe,” two imprisoned gang members, as well as posting non-gang related lyrics from popular rap songs?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of December 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Where a condition of petitioner’s house arrest was that he not “communicate with” fellow members of a gang, was not there insufficient evidence that petitioner violated that condition by merely identifying himself as a gang member on his MySpace page and posting therein the message “Free Quil and Joe,” two imprisoned gang members, as well as posting non-gang related lyrics from popular rap songs?

Commonwealth v. Scott, 9 A.3d 1136, 607 Pa. 625, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2855 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

9 A.3d 1136 (Commonwealth v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.