Commonwealth v. Schwarzschild

102 A. 412, 259 Pa. 130, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 530
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 30, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 11·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The correct conclusion of the learned court below was that the bonus imposed by the Act of May 8,1901, P. L. 150, is upon the capital or property of a foreign corporation actually employed within this State, and the judgment is affirmed, on the opinion directing it to be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Schwarzschild, 102 A. 412, 259 Pa. 130, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 530 (Pa. 1917).

102 A. 412 (Commonwealth v. Schwarzschild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.
84 Pa. D. & C. 293 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1952)
Insurace Co. Investments
36 Pa. D. & C. 240 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1939)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1939
Commonwealth v. Large Distilling Co.
22 Pa. D. & C. 147 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)
Commonwealth v. Bigelow-Willey Motor Co.
5 Pa. D. & C. 378 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)
Commonwealth v. Merchant Shipbuilding Corp.
3 Pa. D. & C. 670 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)