Commonwealth v. Schultz

300 A.2d 774, 224 Pa. Super. 727
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 8, 1973·No. Appeal, No. 840·Published

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Judgment of sentence affirmed, and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has com[728]*728plied with the sentence, or any part thereof which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a snpersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Schultz, 300 A.2d 774, 224 Pa. Super. 727 (Pa. Ct. App. 1973).

300 A.2d 774 (Commonwealth v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.