Commonwealth v. Schneiderman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Schneiderman

58 A.2d 196, 162 Pa. Super. 461, 1948 Pa. Super. LEXIS 259

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 15, 1948

DocketAppeal, 118

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 58 A.2d 196 (Commonwealth v. Schneiderman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Schneiderman, 58 A.2d 196, 162 Pa. Super. 461, 1948 Pa. Super. LEXIS 259 (Pa. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant states that this is an appeal from an order of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Westmoreland County of October 25, 1946, directing him to pay the costs of prosecution and the sum' of 150 a riiónth for the support of his wife in a desertion and nonsupport case. The appeal was taken to this Court on November 12, 1947. Under the circumstances, the appeal must be quashed. The Act of May 11, 1927, P. L. 972 amending section 4 of the Act of May 19, 1897, P. L. 67, 12 PS §1136, provides: “No appeal shall be allowed, in any case, from a sentence or order of any court of . quarter *463 sessions , ■. .,- unless taken within forty-five days from the entry of the sentence or order.” Such a statutory provision is mandatory.. Pittsburgh v. Ruffner, 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 192, 197, 4 A. 2d 224; Com. v. Montgomery, 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 342, 344, 31 A. 2d 913.

In addition to the order of the court below, appellant has assigned as error the refusal by that, court of his petition for a rehearing and review of., the order of the court of October 25,, 1946,. Appellant’s petition for rehearing, and review was filed December 5, 1946. On the same day, the court below refused a r.ehearing. Appellant filed exceptions to the action of the court below in this respect .on. December 11-, 1946. No disposition was made of the exceptions by the court until October 2,1947. The petition for rehearing and review of the original order of the court did not take the place of an appeal from that order. Com. ex rel. Isaacs v. Isaacs, 124 Pa. Superior Ct. 450, 455, 188 A. 551; Rumsey’s Casey 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 515, 517, 7 A. 2d 43; Seem’s Estate, 341 Pa. 198, 19 A. 2d 60.

An order for Support can be altered upon petition, if the circumstances, which existed when the application in the first instance was made,-have materially and substantially- changed; but such is not the situation presented om averred in appellant’s petition. See Com. ex rel. Iacovella v. Iacovella, 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 139, 144, 182 A. 727; Act of June 19, 1939, P. L. 440, No. 250, 17 PS §263.

Appeal; is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Appellant states that this is an appeal from an order of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Westmoreland County of October 25, 1946, directing him to pay the costs of prosecution and the sum' of 150 a riiónth for the support of his wife in a desertion and nonsupport case. The appeal was taken to this Court on November 12, 1947. Under the circumstances, the appeal must be quashed. The Act of May 11, 1927, P. L. 972 amending section 4 of the Act of May 19, 1897, P. L. 67, 12 PS §1136, provides: “No appeal shall be allowed, in any case, from a sentence or order of any court of . quarter *463 sessions , ■. .,- unless taken within forty-five days from the entry of the sentence or order.” Such a statutory provision is mandatory.. Pittsburgh v. Ruffner, 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 192, 197, 4 A. 2d 224; Com. v. Montgomery, 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 342, 344, 31 A. 2d 913.

In addition to the order of the court below, appellant has assigned as error the refusal by that, court of his petition for a rehearing and review of., the order of the court of October 25,, 1946,. Appellant’s petition for rehearing, and review was filed December 5, 1946. On the same day, the court below refused a r.ehearing. Appellant filed exceptions to the action of the court below in this respect .on. December 11-, 1946. No disposition was made of the exceptions by the court until October 2,1947. The petition for rehearing and review of the original order of the court did not take the place of an appeal from that order. Com. ex rel. Isaacs v. Isaacs, 124 Pa. Superior Ct. 450, 455, 188 A. 551; Rumsey’s Casey 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 515, 517, 7 A. 2d 43; Seem’s Estate, 341 Pa. 198, 19 A. 2d 60.

An order for Support can be altered upon petition, if the circumstances, which existed when the application in the first instance was made,-have materially and substantially- changed; but such is not the situation presented om averred in appellant’s petition. See Com. ex rel. Iacovella v. Iacovella, 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 139, 144, 182 A. 727; Act of June 19, 1939, P. L. 440, No. 250, 17 PS §263.

Appeal; is quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.2d 196, 162 Pa. Super. 461, 1948 Pa. Super. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-schneiderman-pasuperct-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack