Commonwealth v. Schebergen
356 N.E.2d 268, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 846, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 646
Opinion
The juvenile proceedings (which the defendant argues should have barred his subsequent trial in the Superior Court on the principle of double jeopardy) occurred in October, 1974. His argument is therefore foreclosed by Commonwealth v. A Juvenile (No. 2), 370 Mass. 677, 678 (1976), which held that Breed v. Jones, 421 U. S. 519 (1975), “is not applicable to juvenile proceedings which were conducted prior to the date of that decision on May 27, 1975.” See Commonwealth v. Cowan, ante, 796 (1976).
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Schebergen, 356 N.E.2d 268, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 846, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 646 (Mass. Ct. App. 1976).
356 N.E.2d 268 (Commonwealth v. Schebergen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Breed v. Jones
421 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Commonwealth vs. a Juvenile
351 N.E.2d 521 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1976)