Commonwealth v. Schebergen

356 N.E.2d 268, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 846, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 646
CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court
DecidedOctober 28, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 356 N.E.2d 268 (Commonwealth v. Schebergen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Schebergen, 356 N.E.2d 268, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 846, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 646 (Mass. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

The juvenile proceedings (which the defendant argues should have barred his subsequent trial in the Superior Court on the principle of double jeopardy) occurred in October, 1974. His argument is therefore foreclosed by Commonwealth v. A Juvenile (No. 2), 370 Mass. 677, 678 (1976), which held that Breed v. Jones, 421 U. S. 519 (1975), “is not applicable to juvenile proceedings which were conducted prior to the date of that decision on May 27, 1975.” See Commonwealth v. Cowan, ante, 796 (1976).

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Breed v. Jones
421 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Commonwealth vs. a Juvenile
351 N.E.2d 521 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 N.E.2d 268, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 846, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-schebergen-massappct-1976.