Commonwealth v. Satterfield, J.
This text of Commonwealth v. Satterfield, J. (Commonwealth v. Satterfield, J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 66 - 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 439 MAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : JACK EDWARD SATTERFIELD, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court erred when it affirmed the trial court’s imposition of illegal sentences when the trial court sentenced petitioner to separate, consecutive sentences on three counts of accidents involving death or personal injury where the applicable statue contemplates a single offense for each accident regardless of the number of persons injured or killed in such an accident?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Satterfield, J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-satterfield-j-pa-2020.