Commonwealth v. Satterfield, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 17, 2020·No. 439 MAL 2020 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

M.D. Appeal Dkt. 66 - 2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 439 MAL 2020 :

Respondent :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

JACK EDWARD SATTERFIELD, :

:

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred when it affirmed the trial court’s imposition of illegal sentences when the trial court sentenced petitioner to separate, consecutive sentences on three counts of accidents involving death or personal injury where the applicable statue contemplates a single offense for each accident regardless of the number of persons injured or killed in such an accident?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Satterfield, J., (Pa. 2020).

Commonwealth v. Satterfield, J. (Commonwealth v. Satterfield, J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.