Commonwealth v. Satchell

21 A.3d 677, 610 Pa. 448, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1318
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 6, 2011·No. 599 EAL 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2011, the Motion to Amend, the Application for Relief, and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal are hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Satchell, 21 A.3d 677, 610 Pa. 448, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1318 (Pa. 2011).

21 A.3d 677 (Commonwealth v. Satchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Edmiston
21 A.3d 677 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)