Commonwealth v. Sasser
This text of 309 A.2d 352 (Commonwealth v. Sasser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
Appellant Robert Sasser’s judgment of sentence upon conviction of second degree murder is affirmed. This Court will not consider appellant’s contention that his extrajudicial statement should have been suppressed because the fruit of an unlawful arrest in view of his failure to raise that issue pretrial as required by Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 323(b). Appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to show his participation in the murder is meritless. Commonwealth v. Robb, 284 Pa. 99, 139 A. 392 (1925). See also Commonwealth v. Pierce, 437 Pa. 266, 263 A. 2d 359 (1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 A.2d 352, 453 Pa. 622, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-sasser-pa-1973.