Commonwealth v. Saranchak
This text of 767 A.2d 541 (Commonwealth v. Saranchak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2001, upon consideration of the application for reargument filed by the Defender [251]*251Association of Philadelphia, it is hereby ORDERED that the PCRA court shall conduct a colloquy with Daniel M. Saranchak to determine the veracity of the unsworn declaration which was attached to the application, as well as Daniel M. Saranchak’s present intentions with regard to the pursuit of post-conviction relief and the reinstatement of the Defender Association of Philadelphia as his counsel. Such colloquy is to be recorded, transcribed and submitted to this Court. For purposes of the colloquy and any associated proceedings, the Defender Association of Philadelphia shall be permitted to serve as counsel for Saranchak, if this is consistent with his wishes at the time of the colloquy as determined by the PCRA court.
Jurisdiction is retained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
767 A.2d 541, 564 Pa. 250, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-saranchak-pa-2001.