Commonwealth v. Santiago

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Santiago

370 A.2d 1222, 246 Pa. Super. 342, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1939

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 3, 1977

DocketAppeal No. 1789

StatusPublished

This text of 370 A.2d 1222 (Commonwealth v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Santiago, 370 A.2d 1222, 246 Pa. Super. 342, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1939 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of sentence for possession of methamphetamine is reversed and as to that charge, appellant is discharged. See Commonwealth v. Fortune, 456 Pa. 365, 318 A.2d 327 (1974). The convictions of possession with intent to deliver heroin and criminal conspiracy are affirmed. However, the judgments of sentence imposed on those convictions are vacated and the record is remanded for resentencing. See Commonwealth v. Staley, 229 Pa. Super. 322, 324 A.2d 393 (1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of sentence for possession of methamphetamine is reversed and as to that charge, appellant is discharged. See Commonwealth v. Fortune, 456 Pa. 365, 318 A.2d 327 (1974). The convictions of possession with intent to deliver heroin and criminal conspiracy are affirmed. However, the judgments of sentence imposed on those convictions are vacated and the record is remanded for resentencing. See Commonwealth v. Staley, 229 Pa. Super. 322, 324 A.2d 393 (1974).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

370 A.2d 1222, 246 Pa. Super. 342, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-santiago-pasuperct-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack