Commonwealth v. Santiago

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Santiago

370 A.2d 1222, 246 Pa. Super. 342, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1939

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 Pa. Super. 74 →

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 3, 1977·No. Appeal No. 1789·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of sentence for possession of methamphetamine is reversed and as to that charge, appellant is discharged. See Commonwealth v. Fortune, 456 Pa. 365, 318 A.2d 327 (1974). The convictions of possession with intent to deliver heroin and criminal conspiracy are affirmed. However, the judgments of sentence imposed on those convictions are vacated and the record is remanded for resentencing. See Commonwealth v. Staley, 229 Pa. Super. 322, 324 A.2d 393 (1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of sentence for possession of methamphetamine is reversed and as to that charge, appellant is discharged. See Commonwealth v. Fortune, 456 Pa. 365, 318 A.2d 327 (1974). The convictions of possession with intent to deliver heroin and criminal conspiracy are affirmed. However, the judgments of sentence imposed on those convictions are vacated and the record is remanded for resentencing. See Commonwealth v. Staley, 229 Pa. Super. 322, 324 A.2d 393 (1974).

Commonwealth v. Santiago, 370 A.2d 1222, 246 Pa. Super. 342, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1939 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

370 A.2d 1222 (Commonwealth v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related