Commonwealth v. Santiago
179 A.3d 455
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 22, 2018
DocketNo. 318 EAL 2017
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 179 A.3d 455 (Commonwealth v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Santiago, 179 A.3d 455 (Pa. 2018).
Opinion
AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue, as stated by Petitioner:
Is not the Superior Court's published opinion applying the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine to in-court identification testimony inconsistent with controlling Fourth Amendment United States Supreme Court precedent and Article I, § 8, and does not its reliance on overly broad language in Commonwealth v. Garvin,448 Pa. 258 ,293 A.2d 33 (1972), necessitate this Court's guidance and explicit rejection of Garvin and its progeny?
The Petition is otherwise DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Santiago, A., Aplt.
209 A.3d 912 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019)
Com. v. Dickerson, V.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
179 A.3d 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-santiago-pa-2018.