Commonwealth v. Santana, D.
This text of Commonwealth v. Santana, D. (Commonwealth v. Santana, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 23 MAP 2021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 654 MAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : DAVID SANTANA, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:
(1) Did the Superior Court err in determining that [Respondent] was not required to register under SORNA even though he was already required to register for life in New York and relocated to Pennsylvania after the effective date of SORNA?
(2) Did the Superior Court err in finding an ex post facto violation even though [Respondent] was not disadvantaged any more than his lifetime registration he was already subject to under New York law?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Santana, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-santana-d-pa-2021.