Commonwealth v. Sanford

78 Mass. 174
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1858
StatusPublished

This text of 78 Mass. 174 (Commonwealth v. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Sanford, 78 Mass. 174 (Mass. 1858).

Opinion

Indictment on St. 1840, c. 80, against an owner and master of the Steamer Menemon Sanford, for the loss, by his negligence, of the life of Allen Frazer, of Orland, in the State of Maine. The indictment, after setting out the defendant’s negligence and the consequent loss of Frazer’s life, alleged that the defendant was liable to a fine not exceeding $5000, nor less than $500, to be recovered by indictment to the use of Frazer’s executor or administrator, for the benefit of his widow and children, one moiety to her and the other to them; that Oliver Bowley, of Orland aforesaid, had been duly appointed under the laws of the State of Maine, and now was, administrator of Frazer, and of his goods and estate; and that Frazer at his death left a widow and children. But it did not allege that ancillary administration had been taken out in this commonwealth. After argument of the case in this court, by R. Choate & C. A. Welch, for the defendant, and G. W. Cooley, (County Attorney,) for the Commonwealth, upon exceptions to the rulings and instructions of the municipal court of Boston, the Court intimated to the attorney for the Commonwealth that this omission was fatal to the indictment, and he afterwards entered a

Nolle prosequi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 Mass. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-sanford-mass-1858.