Commonwealth v. Samuel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Samuel

933 A.2d 649

DecidedSeptember 27, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 933 A.2d 649 (Commonwealth v. Samuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Samuel, 933 A.2d 649 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the trial court erred in applying § 9714 mandatory strike two provision when Petitioner had not been convicted of a crime of violence in the instant case as the jury was neither instructed to find nor did it find that a person was present when Petitioner entered a building adapted for overnight accommodation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the trial court erred in applying § 9714 mandatory strike two provision when Petitioner had not been convicted of a crime of violence in the instant case as the jury was neither instructed to find nor did it find that a person was present when Petitioner entered a building adapted for overnight accommodation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

933 A.2d 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-samuel-pa-2007.