Commonwealth v. Ryan

381 A.2d 138, 475 Pa. 559, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 928
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 23, 1977·No. 326 and 398·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*560 OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted after a trial by jury of murder of the second degree, burglary and robbery. He contends that the trial testimony of two witnesses should have been suppressed as the fruit of a confession held illegal at a pre-trial suppression hearing. Appellant, however, did not object at trial to the admission of the testimony of the witnesses. Consequently, the issue has been waived. See e. g., Commonwealth v. Sparrow, 471 Pa. 490, 370 A.2d 712 (1977); Commonwealth v. Brown, 467 Pa. 512, 359 A.2d 393 (1976).

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Ryan, 381 A.2d 138, 475 Pa. 559, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 928 (Pa. 1977).

381 A.2d 138 (Commonwealth v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Burchard
503 A.2d 936 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Commonwealth v. Thomas
498 A.2d 1345 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Commonwealth v. Humphreys
406 A.2d 1060 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Herrmann
381 A.2d 138 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)