Commonwealth v. Rubinstein

419 A.2d 1335, 278 Pa. Super. 20, 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2576
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 16, 1980·No. Interlocutory Appeal No. 2054·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an interlocutory appeal1 challenging the constitutionality of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4911 (tampering with public records) on the ground of vagueness. It does not involve any First Amendment freedoms. The Defendant has not been tried.

“It is well established that vagueness challenges to statutes which do not involve First Amendment freedoms must be examined in the light of the facts of the case at hand.” United States v. Mazuire, 419 U.S. 544, 550, 95 S.Ct. 710, 714, 42 L.Ed.2d 706, 713 (1975). Commonwealth v. Manlin, 270 Pa.Super. 290, 411 A.2d 532 (1979).

This appeal, having been improvidently granted, is hereby quashed and the stay of proceedings set aside.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Rubinstein, 419 A.2d 1335, 278 Pa. Super. 20, 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2576 (Pa. Ct. App. 1980).

419 A.2d 1335 (Commonwealth v. Rubinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Weldon
430 A.2d 1180 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)