Commonwealth v. Rubinstein
This text of 419 A.2d 1335 (Commonwealth v. Rubinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an interlocutory appeal1 challenging the constitutionality of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4911 (tampering with public records) on the ground of vagueness. It does not involve any First Amendment freedoms. The Defendant has not been tried.
“It is well established that vagueness challenges to statutes which do not involve First Amendment freedoms must be examined in the light of the facts of the case at hand.” United States v. Mazuire, 419 U.S. 544, 550, 95 S.Ct. 710, 714, 42 L.Ed.2d 706, 713 (1975). Commonwealth v. Manlin, 270 Pa.Super. 290, 411 A.2d 532 (1979).
This appeal, having been improvidently granted, is hereby quashed and the stay of proceedings set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 A.2d 1335, 278 Pa. Super. 20, 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-rubinstein-pasuperct-1980.