Commonwealth v. Rowe

6 N.E. 545, 141 Mass. 79, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 131
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 30, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The motion to quash was rightly overruled. The regulation of the board of aldermen, under which the complaint is brought, provides that no person “ having the care or ordering of a vehicle shall suffer the same to stop in a street for more than twenty minutes.” The obvious meaning of the regulation is that no vehicle shall be allowed to make a continuous stop of more than twenty minutes. The complaint substantially follows the regulation, and, by its natural and obvious construction, charges a continuous stopping for a longer time than twenty minutes, and is sufficient. Commonwealth v. Barrett, 108 Mass. 302. Commonwealth v. Fenton, 139 Mass. 195.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Rowe, 6 N.E. 545, 141 Mass. 79, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 131 (Mass. 1886).

6 N.E. 545 (Commonwealth v. Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Petralia
362 N.E.2d 513 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1977)
Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of Representatives
297 Mass. 559 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)