Commonwealth v. Rought

245 A.2d 476, 212 Pa. Super. 759, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1323
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 28, 1968·No. Appeal, No. 598·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), the order of the court below is reversed and the record is remitted with in[760]*760structions to appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Rought, 245 A.2d 476, 212 Pa. Super. 759, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1323 (Pa. Ct. App. 1968).

245 A.2d 476 (Commonwealth v. Rought) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Hoffman
232 A.2d 623 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)