Commonwealth v. Rought

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Rought

245 A.2d 257, 431 Pa. 164, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 606

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 22, 1968

DocketNo. 107

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.2d 257 (Commonwealth v. Rought) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Rought, 245 A.2d 257, 431 Pa. 164, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 606 (Pa. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The petition for allowance of appeal is granted. The order of the Superior Court is vacated, and the record is remanded to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Wyoming County for appointment of counsel on appeal to the Superior Court in accordance with the dissenting opinion of Judge Spaulding in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 212 Pa. Superior Ct. 206, 240 A. 2d 384 (1968) (Hoffman, J. and Hannum, J., joined in this opinion). See also Commonwealth v. Walters, 431 Pa. 74, 79, n.4, 244 A. 2d 757, 761, n.4 (1968) ; Pa. R. Crim. P. 1503.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The petition for allowance of appeal is granted. The order of the Superior Court is vacated, and the record is remanded to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Wyoming County for appointment of counsel on appeal to the Superior Court in accordance with the dissenting opinion of Judge Spaulding in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 212 Pa. Superior Ct. 206, 240 A. 2d 384 (1968) (Hoffman, J. and Hannum, J., joined in this opinion). See also Commonwealth v. Walters, 431 Pa. 74, 79, n.4, 244 A. 2d 757, 761, n.4 (1968) ; Pa. R. Crim. P. 1503.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.2d 257, 431 Pa. 164, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-rought-pa-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack