Commonwealth v. Rought

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Rought

245 A.2d 258, 431 Pa. 163, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 605

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 22, 1968·No. No. 108·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The petition for allowance of appeal is granted. The order of the Superior Court is vacated, and the record is remanded to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Sus[164] quehanna County for appointment of counsel on appeal to the Superior Court in accordance with the dissenting opinion of Judge Spaulding in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 212 Pa. Superior Ct. 206, 240 A. 2d 384 (1968) (Hoffman, J. and Hannum, J., joined in this opinion). See also Commonwealth v. Walters, 431 Pa. 74, 79, n.4, 244 A. 2d 757, 761, n.4 (1968); Pa. R. Crim. P. 1503.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The petition for allowance of appeal is granted. The order of the Superior Court is vacated, and the record is remanded to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Sus[164] quehanna County for appointment of counsel on appeal to the Superior Court in accordance with the dissenting opinion of Judge Spaulding in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 212 Pa. Superior Ct. 206, 240 A. 2d 384 (1968) (Hoffman, J. and Hannum, J., joined in this opinion). See also Commonwealth v. Walters, 431 Pa. 74, 79, n.4, 244 A. 2d 757, 761, n.4 (1968); Pa. R. Crim. P. 1503.

Commonwealth v. Rought, 245 A.2d 258, 431 Pa. 163, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 605 (Pa. 1968).

Pincite

245 A.2d 258 (Commonwealth v. Rought) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related