Commonwealth v. Rossetti

456 A.2d 984, 500 Pa. 338, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 486
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 16, 1983·No. Appeals No. 80-3-383·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s challenge to the jury voir dire procedure is controlled by our holdings in Commonwealth v. Moore, 462 Pa. 231, 340 A.2d 447 (1975), Commonwealth v. Moon, 389 Pa. 304, 132 A.2d 224 (1957), and Commonwealth v. Bibalo, 375 Pa. 257, 100 A.2d 45 (1953). Accordingly, the judgments of sentences must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Rossetti, 456 A.2d 984, 500 Pa. 338, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 486 (Pa. 1983).

456 A.2d 984 (Commonwealth v. Rossetti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Moore
340 A.2d 447 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Commonwealth v. Moon
132 A.2d 224 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Commonwealth v. Bibalo
100 A.2d 45 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)