Commonwealth v. Rosado, F.

129 A.3d 1237, 634 Pa. 355, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 3142
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 31, 2015
Docket375 MAL 2015 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 129 A.3d 1237 (Commonwealth v. Rosado, F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Rosado, F., 129 A.3d 1237, 634 Pa. 355, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 3142 (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is as follows:

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred by upholding the decision of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas denying Petitioner PCRA relief in the form of a nunc pro tunc Superior Court appeal from his trial where it was clearly demonstrated that Petitioner was never given the opportunity to have his appeal heard by such court as the result [of] ineffective representation of prior counsel?
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Rosado
150 A.3d 425 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
Commonwealth v. Rosado, F., Aplt
150 A.3d 425 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.3d 1237, 634 Pa. 355, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 3142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-rosado-f-pa-2015.