Commonwealth v. Rosado, F.
129 A.3d 1237, 634 Pa. 355, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 3142
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 31, 2015·No. 375 MAL 2015 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is as follows:
Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred by upholding the decision of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas denying Petitioner PCRA relief in the form of a nunc pro tunc Superior Court appeal from his trial where it was clearly demonstrated that Petitioner was never given the opportunity to have his appeal heard by such court as the result [of] ineffective representation of prior counsel?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Rosado, F., 129 A.3d 1237, 634 Pa. 355, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 3142 (Pa. 2015).
129 A.3d 1237 (Commonwealth v. Rosado, F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Rosado
150 A.3d 425 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
Commonwealth v. Rosado, F., Aplt
150 A.3d 425 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)