Commonwealth v. Roman

639 A.2d 1178, 536 Pa. 444, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 99
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 8, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 639 A.2d 1178 (Commonwealth v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Roman, 639 A.2d 1178, 536 Pa. 444, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 99 (Pa. 1994).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.

PAPADAKOS, J., files a dissenting opinion.

MONTEMURO, J., who was an appointed Justice of the Court at the time of argument, participated in the decision of this case in his capacity as a Senior Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Tribble
467 A.2d 1130 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Commonwealth v. Farquharson
354 A.2d 545 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Hubbard
372 A.2d 687 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Cristina
391 A.2d 1307 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Martin
387 A.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Commonwealth v. New
47 A.2d 450 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 A.2d 1178, 536 Pa. 444, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-roman-pa-1994.