Commonwealth v. Roman

639 A.2d 1178, 536 Pa. 444, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 99
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 8, 1994·Published

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.

PAPADAKOS, J., files a dissenting opinion.

MONTEMURO, J., who was an appointed Justice of the Court at the time of argument, participated in the decision of this case in his capacity as a Senior Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Roman, 639 A.2d 1178, 536 Pa. 444, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 99 (Pa. 1994).

639 A.2d 1178 (Commonwealth v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Tribble
467 A.2d 1130 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Commonwealth v. Farquharson
354 A.2d 545 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Hubbard
372 A.2d 687 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Cristina
391 A.2d 1307 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Martin
387 A.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Commonwealth v. New
47 A.2d 450 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)