Commonwealth v. Roman
This text of 387 A.2d 661 (Commonwealth v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal from appellant’s second conviction of second degree murder which arose from the killing of the deceased on October 13, 1973.1 Appellant raises nine issues in this appeal, all of which are without merit except the ninth, which was waived.
1) That the trial court,erred in refusing to sustain appellant’s demurrer;
2) That the trial court erred in admitting statements which, appellant claims, were hearsay;
3) That the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a mistrial;
[621]*6214) That the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a change of venue;
5) That the appellant’s case was prejudiced by a remark made by the District Attorney which, appellant claims, adversely commented on appellant’s failure to testify;
6) That the trial court erred in its response to a juror’s question concerning aiding and abetting;
7) That the trial court erred in refusing two of appellant’s points for charge;
8 and 9)
That the trial court erred in its charge by stating facts which, appellant claims, had no basis in the record.
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
387 A.2d 661, 478 Pa. 619, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-roman-pa-1978.