Commonwealth v. Roman

387 A.2d 661, 478 Pa. 619, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 703
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 5, 1978·No. No. 62·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from appellant’s second conviction of second degree murder which arose from the killing of the deceased on October 13, 1973.1 Appellant raises nine issues in this appeal, all of which are without merit except the ninth, which was waived.

1) That the trial court,erred in refusing to sustain appellant’s demurrer;

2) That the trial court erred in admitting statements which, appellant claims, were hearsay;

3) That the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a mistrial;

[621]*6214) That the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a change of venue;

5) That the appellant’s case was prejudiced by a remark made by the District Attorney which, appellant claims, adversely commented on appellant’s failure to testify;

6) That the trial court erred in its response to a juror’s question concerning aiding and abetting;

7) That the trial court erred in refusing two of appellant’s points for charge;

8 and 9)

That the trial court erred in its charge by stating facts which, appellant claims, had no basis in the record.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Roman, 387 A.2d 661, 478 Pa. 619, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 703 (Pa. 1978).

387 A.2d 661 (Commonwealth v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ragan
645 A.2d 811 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Commonwealth v. Roman
431 A.2d 936 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)