Commonwealth v. Rollo

89 N.E. 556, 203 Mass. 354, 1909 Mass. LEXIS 939
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 20, 1909·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Hammond, J.

One of the legitimate arguments which could have been made against the credibility of the complainant’s story was that she did not promptly complain to her mother. While the conversation which took place between the defendant’s wife and the complainant was not admissible as evidence of any fact, or even of the good faith of the wife in making the threat therein contained, yet it was admissible as tending to explain the delay of the complainant in making her complaint. This is too plain to require discussion or the citation of authorities.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Rollo, 89 N.E. 556, 203 Mass. 354, 1909 Mass. LEXIS 939 (Mass. 1909).

89 N.E. 556 (Commonwealth v. Rollo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Montanino
553 N.E.2d 223 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1990)
Commonwealth v. Washington
549 N.E.2d 446 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1990)
Commonwealth v. Brenner
465 N.E.2d 1229 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1984)
Commonwealth v. Edgerly
435 N.E.2d 641 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1982)
Commonwealth v. Wilson
426 N.E.2d 162 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1981)
Commonwealth v. Hanger
258 N.E.2d 555 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Ellis
67 N.E.2d 234 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Glover v. Callahan
12 N.E.2d 194 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Commonwealth v. Colangelo
256 Mass. 165 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)