Commonwealth v. Rollins, J.
This text of Commonwealth v. Rollins, J. (Commonwealth v. Rollins, J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 27 MAL 2022 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : JOSEPH MELVIN ROLLINS, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in finding that the absence of a maximum term did not render the [driving under a suspended license] sentencing provision under 75 Pa. C.S.[] § 1543(b)(1)(iii) unconstitutionally vague violating state and federal due process provisions?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Rollins, J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-rollins-j-pa-2022.