Commonwealth v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Rogers

694 A.2d 342

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 25, 1997

DocketPetition No. 115 Western District Allocatur Docket 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 694 A.2d 342 (Commonwealth v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Rogers, 694 A.2d 342 (Pa. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The decision of the Superior Court is REVERSED. The matter is REMANDED to the Trial Court to allow Petitioner to file a Motion for New Trial Nunc Pro Tunc challenging the weight of the evidence pursuant to Rule of Criminal Procedure 1410(b)(l)(a)(iv). See Commonwealth v. Widmer, 547 Pa. 137, 689 A.2d 211 (1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The decision of the Superior Court is REVERSED. The matter is REMANDED to the Trial Court to allow Petitioner to file a Motion for New Trial Nunc Pro Tunc challenging the weight of the evidence pursuant to Rule of Criminal Procedure 1410(b)(l)(a)(iv). See Commonwealth v. Widmer, 547 Pa. 137, 689 A.2d 211 (1997).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

694 A.2d 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-rogers-pa-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack