Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
This text of 3 A.3d 668 (Commonwealth v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*93 ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2010, upon consideration of the “Request for Leave to File a Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc,” this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The trial court is directed to determine whether counsel of record should be permitted to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120 and Comment. If the court permits counsel of record to withdraw, the court must also consider whether Petitioner is entitled to court-appointed counsel. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 122. Upon the issuance of the trial court’s order, counsel, or Petitioner proceeding pro se, shall have thirty days to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.3d 668, 607 Pa. 92, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-rodriguez-pa-2010.