Commonwealth v. Rodland, C., Pet
This text of Commonwealth v. Rodland, C., Pet (Commonwealth v. Rodland, C., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 86 WM 2017 : Respondent : : : v. : : : CHRISTOPHER M. RODLAND, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Review of Stay
Order from the Superior Court and the Petition to Immediately Stay/Vacate Superior
Court Order are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994)
(explaining that hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to
forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Rodland, C., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-rodland-c-pet-pa-2017.