Commonwealth v. Rodland, C., Pet

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 28, 2017·No. 86 WM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 86 WM 2017 : Respondent : : : v. : : : CHRISTOPHER M. RODLAND, : : Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Review of Stay

Order from the Superior Court and the Petition to Immediately Stay/Vacate Superior

Court Order are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994)

(explaining that hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to

forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Rodland, C., Pet, (Pa. 2017).

Commonwealth v. Rodland, C., Pet (Commonwealth v. Rodland, C., Pet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)