Commonwealth v. Roby-Spencer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Roby-Spencer

911 A.2d 503

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Roby-Spencer. Read the opinion of the Court — 594 Pa. 14 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 24, 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:

Whether the Superior Court erred in failing to evaluate the agreement to move for petitioner’s admission into the ARD program as a specific performance of a contract type of action (non-prosecution agreement) and to decide the matter pursuant to the analysis set forth in Commonwealth v. Stipetich, 428 Pa.Super. 427, 621 A.2d 606 (1993), and Commonwealth v. Ginn, 402 Pa.Super. 405, 587 A.2d 314 (1991).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:

Whether the Superior Court erred in failing to evaluate the agreement to move for petitioner’s admission into the ARD program as a specific performance of a contract type of action (non-prosecution agreement) and to decide the matter pursuant to the analysis set forth in Commonwealth v. Stipetich, 428 Pa.Super. 427, 621 A.2d 606 (1993), and Commonwealth v. Ginn, 402 Pa.Super. 405, 587 A.2d 314 (1991).

Commonwealth v. Roby-Spencer, 911 A.2d 503 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

911 A.2d 503 (Commonwealth v. Roby-Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related