Commonwealth v. Roby-Spencer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Roby-Spencer

911 A.2d 503

DecidedOctober 24, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 911 A.2d 503 (Commonwealth v. Roby-Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Roby-Spencer, 911 A.2d 503 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:

Whether the Superior Court erred in failing to evaluate the agreement to move for petitioner’s admission into the ARD program as a specific performance of a contract type of action (non-prosecution agreement) and to decide the matter pursuant to the analysis set forth in Commonwealth v. Stipetich, 428 Pa.Super. 427, 621 A.2d 606 (1993), and Commonwealth v. Ginn, 402 Pa.Super. 405, 587 A.2d 314 (1991).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:

Whether the Superior Court erred in failing to evaluate the agreement to move for petitioner’s admission into the ARD program as a specific performance of a contract type of action (non-prosecution agreement) and to decide the matter pursuant to the analysis set forth in Commonwealth v. Stipetich, 428 Pa.Super. 427, 621 A.2d 606 (1993), and Commonwealth v. Ginn, 402 Pa.Super. 405, 587 A.2d 314 (1991).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

911 A.2d 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-roby-spencer-pa-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack