Commonwealth v. Robinson

244 A.2d 158, 213 Pa. Super. 727
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 218 Pa. Super. 49
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 9, 1968·No. Appeal, No. 616·Published

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In accordance with Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963), and Commonwealth ex rel. Cunningham v. Maroney, 421 Pa. 157, 218 A. 2d 811 (1966), the order is vacated and the record remanded with instructions to the court below to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel on appeal. If the court finds that the right to counsel on appeal was not waived, appellant shall be permitted to appeal nunc pro tunc and counsel shall be appointed to represent appellant in prosecuting that appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Robinson, 244 A.2d 158, 213 Pa. Super. 727 (Pa. Ct. App. 1968).

244 A.2d 158 (Commonwealth v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Douglas v. California
372 U.S. 353 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cunningham v. Maroney
218 A.2d 811 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)