Commonwealth v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Roberts

920 A.2d 186

DecidedMay 1, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 920 A.2d 186 (Commonwealth v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Roberts, 920 A.2d 186 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for disposition of the merits. “The requirement that the clerk time stamp and make docket entries of the filings in these cases only serves to provide a record of the filing, and does not trigger any deadline nor require any response.” Pa.R.Crim.P. 576(A)(4), comment. See Commonwealth v. Ellis, 534 Pa. 176, 626 A.2d 1137 (1993) (no constitutional right to hybrid representation on appeal). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for disposition of the merits. “The requirement that the clerk time stamp and make docket entries of the filings in these cases only serves to provide a record of the filing, and does not trigger any deadline nor require any response.” Pa.R.Crim.P. 576(A)(4), comment. See Commonwealth v. Ellis, 534 Pa. 176, 626 A.2d 1137 (1993) (no constitutional right to hybrid representation on appeal). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

920 A.2d 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-roberts-pa-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack