Commonwealth v. Rishel

682 A.2d 1267, 546 Pa. 48, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1972
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 2, 1996·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 1996, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted. The judgment of sentence is vacated and case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion in Commonwealth v. Barud, — Pa. -, 681 A.2d 162 (1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Rishel, 682 A.2d 1267, 546 Pa. 48, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 1972 (Pa. 1996).

682 A.2d 1267 (Commonwealth v. Rishel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Jones
121 A.3d 524 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Commonwealth v. Kerry
906 A.2d 1237 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Commonwealth v. Johnson
846 A.2d 161 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Commonwealth v. Martin
694 A.2d 343 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
Commonwealth v. Coon
695 A.2d 794 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
Commonwealth v. Leighty
693 A.2d 1324 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)