Commonwealth v. Riddick
Opinion
The appellant claims, inter alia,
On July 8,1974, a criminal complaint was filed against the appellant charging him with rape.3 Although the 180 day period expired on January 6, 1975, trial did not commence until early in March of 1975. On February 10, 1975, the lower court denied the appellant’s petition to dismiss, see Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(f),4 on the basis that the case had been continued on several occasions because of unavailable courtroom space. No petition to extend was ever filed by the Commonwealth. The lower court was clearly in error when it denied the petition to dismiss. In Commonwealth v. Shelton, 469 Pa. 8, 364 A.2d 694 (1976), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that periods of delay attributable to the judiciary may not be excluded from the computation of the mandatory period.
We therefore reverse the judgment of sentence and order the appellant discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
374 A.2d 1347 (Commonwealth v. Riddick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.