Commonwealth v. Riddick

374 A.2d 1347, 248 Pa. Super. 120, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2039
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 29, 1977·No. No. 136·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PRICE, Judge:

The appellant claims, inter alia,1 that his right to a speedy trial was violated because he was not brought to trial within [122]*122180 days from the date the criminal complaint was lodged against him. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(a)(2).2 The appellant’s claim is meritorious, and we therefore reverse the judgment of sentence and order the appellant discharged.

On July 8,1974, a criminal complaint was filed against the appellant charging him with rape.3 Although the 180 day period expired on January 6, 1975, trial did not commence until early in March of 1975. On February 10, 1975, the lower court denied the appellant’s petition to dismiss, see Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(f),4 on the basis that the case had been continued on several occasions because of unavailable courtroom space. No petition to extend was ever filed by the Commonwealth. The lower court was clearly in error when it denied the petition to dismiss. In Commonwealth v. Shelton, 469 Pa. 8, 364 A.2d 694 (1976), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that periods of delay attributable to the judiciary may not be excluded from the computation of the mandatory period.

We therefore reverse the judgment of sentence and order the appellant discharged.

WATKINS, President Judge, and VAN der VOORT, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Riddick, 374 A.2d 1347, 248 Pa. Super. 120, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2039 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

374 A.2d 1347 (Commonwealth v. Riddick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. McKnight
457 A.2d 1272 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)