Commonwealth v. Ricker, D.

135 A.3d 175, 635 Pa. 255, 2016 WL 1562068, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 817
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 18, 2016·No. 588 MAL 2015 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court wrongly held, in a published opinion of first impression, that a defendant does not have a state or federal constitutional right to confront the witness against him at a preliminary hearing and that a prima fade case may be proven by the Commonwealth through hearsay evidence alone, which is what the trial and magisterial district courts concluded in Petitioner’s case?
Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., 135 A.3d 175, 635 Pa. 255, 2016 WL 1562068, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 817 (Pa. 2016).

135 A.3d 175 (Commonwealth v. Ricker, D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Harris, R.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
Com. v. Harris, R.
2022 Pa. Super. 1 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2022)
Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.
170 A.3d 494 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Commonwealth v. Hilliard
172 A.3d 5 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Com. v. Russell, S.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Mitchell, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. McLaurin, K.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Branch, L.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Colon-Cruz, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017