Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 A.3d 494 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 28, 2017·No. 41 MAP 2016·Published

Opinion

[J-126-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : 41 MAP 2016 : Appellee : Appeal from the Superior Court dated : 7/17/15 at No. 1693 MDA 2014 affirming : the order of the Dauphin County Court of v. : Common Pleas dated 10/1/14 at No. CP- : 22-CR-0003601-2014 : DAVID EDWARD RICKER, : : ARGUED: December 6, 2016 Appellant :

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: September 28, 2017

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2017, this appeal is dismissed as having

been improvidently granted.

Chief Justice Saylor files a concurring statement.

Justice Wecht files a dissenting statement.

Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[J-126-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: September 28, 2017

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2017, this appeal is dismissed as having

been improvidently granted.

Chief Justice Saylor files a concurring statement.

Justice Wecht files a dissenting statement.

Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt., (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt. (Commonwealth v. Ricker, D., Aplt.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.