Commonwealth v. Richards, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 2023·No. 518 MAL 2022 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 518 MAL 2022 :

Respondent :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

JONATHAN RICHARDS, :

:

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) In light of Alleyne v. United States, 70 U.S. 99 (2013) is it not unconstitutional to consider an acceptance of ARD as a prior offense for sentencing purposes without the procedural protections afforded by Alleyne, i.e., a prior offense can only be determined by proof beyond a reasonable doubt?

(2) Is it not fundamentally unfair and a violation of due process to equate a prior acceptance of ARD with a prior conviction for purposes of a recidivist mandatory minimum sentence even though that acceptance involved no proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?

Petitioner’s Motion for Stay of Proceedings is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Richards, J., (Pa. 2023).

Commonwealth v. Richards, J. (Commonwealth v. Richards, J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.