Commonwealth v. Richards, J.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 518 MAL 2022 :
Respondent :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :
: :
JONATHAN RICHARDS, :
:
Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) In light of Alleyne v. United States, 70 U.S. 99 (2013) is it not unconstitutional to consider an acceptance of ARD as a prior offense for sentencing purposes without the procedural protections afforded by Alleyne, i.e., a prior offense can only be determined by proof beyond a reasonable doubt?
(2) Is it not fundamentally unfair and a violation of due process to equate a prior acceptance of ARD with a prior conviction for purposes of a recidivist mandatory minimum sentence even though that acceptance involved no proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Petitioner’s Motion for Stay of Proceedings is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Richards, J. (Commonwealth v. Richards, J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.