Commonwealth v. Rice

986 A.2d 853, 604 Pa. 648, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2888, 2009 WL 5126636
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 30, 2009·No. 94 MAL 2009·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of December 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s Order is REVERSED and Petitioner’s judgment of sentence is VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the trial court for action consistent with our recent decision in Commonwealth v. Haag, 981 A.2d 902 (Pa.2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Rice, 986 A.2d 853, 604 Pa. 648, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2888, 2009 WL 5126636 (Pa. 2009).

986 A.2d 853 (Commonwealth v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Haag
981 A.2d 902 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)