Commonwealth v. Reviera

584 A.2d 308, 526 Pa. 41, 1991 Pa. LEXIS 21
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 14, 1991·No. Appeal 56 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1990·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. ZAPPALA, J., dissents. See Commonwealth v. Baker, 513 Pa. 23, 30, 518 A.2d 802, 806 (1986) (Zappala, J., dissenting). CAPPY, J., dissents and would reach the merits of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Reviera, 584 A.2d 308, 526 Pa. 41, 1991 Pa. LEXIS 21 (Pa. 1991).

584 A.2d 308 (Commonwealth v. Reviera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. v. Moore, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015
Commonwealth v. Glass
754 A.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Commonwealth v. Glass
718 A.2d 804 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Kostelec v. State
685 A.2d 1222 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1996)
Ex Parte Oswalt
686 So. 2d 368 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1996)
Commonwealth v. DiGiovanni
630 A.2d 42 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Commonwealth v. Tillman
621 A.2d 148 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Commonwealth v. Peterson
596 A.2d 172 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)