Commonwealth v. Resto, A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Resto, A.

144 A.3d 93, 636 Pa. 462, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1863

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 23, 2016

Docket774 MAL 2015 (Granted)

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 144 A.3d 93 (Commonwealth v. Resto, A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Resto, A., 144 A.3d 93, 636 Pa. 462, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1863 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as set forth by the Commonwealth, is as follows:

Did the Pennsylvania Superior Court err in holding that the mandatory minimum sentence found in 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9718(a)(3) [is] unconstitutional in light of Alleyne v. United States [— U.S.-], 133 S.Ct. 2151 [186 L.Ed.2d 314] (2013), despite that statutory provision calling for no facts to be found beyond simply being convicted of the enumerated offense?

This matter is to be listed together with Commonwealth v. Bragg, 67 EAL 2016, Commonwealth v. Macklin, 288 MAL *463 2015, and Commonwealth v. Sachette, 973 MAL 2015, for oral argument purposes only.

Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI