Commonwealth v. Renchenski
6 A.3d 1287, 607 Pa. 371, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2450
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2010, the Application for Leave to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:
1. Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(b) of the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) applies to delay in litigating a pending PCRA petition?
2. What obligation, if any, does a petitioner have to seek expeditious litigation of his PCRA petition?
The trial court is directed to appoint counsel to assist Petitioner with this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Renchenski, 6 A.3d 1287, 607 Pa. 371, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2450 (Pa. 2010).
6 A.3d 1287 (Commonwealth v. Renchenski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Renchenski
52 A.3d 251 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Commonwealth v. Markowitz
32 A.3d 706 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Commonwealth v. Weatherill
24 A.3d 435 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)