Commonwealth v. Renchenski
6 A.3d 1287, 607 Pa. 371, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2450
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 25, 2010
Docket4 WAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 6 A.3d 1287 (Commonwealth v. Renchenski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Renchenski, 6 A.3d 1287, 607 Pa. 371, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2450 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2010, the Application for Leave to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:
1. Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(b) of the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) applies to delay in litigating a pending PCRA petition?
2. What obligation, if any, does a petitioner have to seek expeditious litigation of his PCRA petition?
The trial court is directed to appoint counsel to assist Petitioner with this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Renchenski
52 A.3d 251 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Commonwealth v. Markowitz
32 A.3d 706 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Commonwealth v. Weatherill
24 A.3d 435 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 A.3d 1287, 607 Pa. 371, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-renchenski-pa-2010.