Commonwealth v. Reinert
889 A.2d 102, 2005 Pa. Super. 391, 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4082
Opinions
¶ 1 Order affirmed.
¶ 2 Judge STEVENS filed a dissenting opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Reinert, 889 A.2d 102, 2005 Pa. Super. 391, 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4082 (Pa. Ct. App. 2005).
889 A.2d 102 (Commonwealth v. Reinert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cooper v. California
386 U.S. 58 (Supreme Court, 1967)
South Dakota v. Opperman
428 U.S. 364 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Illinois v. Lafayette
462 U.S. 640 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Colorado v. Bertine
479 U.S. 367 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Florida v. Wells
495 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Commonwealth v. Scott
365 A.2d 140 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Hennigan
753 A.2d 245 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Commonwealth v. Smith
808 A.2d 215 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Commonwealth v. Woody
679 A.2d 817 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Commonwealth v. Casanova
748 A.2d 207 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Commonwealth v. Brandt
366 A.2d 1238 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)