Commonwealth v. Reed

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Reed

950 A.2d 263

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Reed. Read the opinion of the Court — 601 Pa. 257 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 16, 2008·No. 641 EAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err by ordering the reinstatement of defendant’s appellate rights nunc pro tunc where his right to appeal was not denied and where he failed to establish that he sustained any prejudice as a result of counsel’s actions?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err by ordering the reinstatement of defendant’s appellate rights nunc pro tunc where his right to appeal was not denied and where he failed to establish that he sustained any prejudice as a result of counsel’s actions?

Commonwealth v. Reed, 950 A.2d 263 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

950 A.2d 263 (Commonwealth v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.