Commonwealth v. Reed

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Reed

950 A.2d 263

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 16, 2008

Docket641 EAL 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 950 A.2d 263 (Commonwealth v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Reed, 950 A.2d 263 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err by ordering the reinstatement of defendant’s appellate rights nunc pro tunc where his right to appeal was not denied and where he failed to establish that he sustained any prejudice as a result of counsel’s actions?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err by ordering the reinstatement of defendant’s appellate rights nunc pro tunc where his right to appeal was not denied and where he failed to establish that he sustained any prejudice as a result of counsel’s actions?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

950 A.2d 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-reed-pa-2008.