Commonwealth v. Redman, R.
This text of 170 A.3d 1024 (Commonwealth v. Redman, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court’s decision conflicts with another Superior Court decision by holding in the instant case that a warrantless legal blood draw can be administered on an unconscious driver where the police officer has probable cause to arrest the driver which is in direct conflict with the holding of the published opinion in Commonwealth v. Myers[, 118 A.3d 1122 (Pa. Super. 2015) ]?
The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Myers, 164 A.3d 1162, 2017 WL 3045867 (Pa. 2017). Allocatur is DENIED without prejudice as to all remaining issues, as the Superior Court has not yet considered them in the first instance, and it may do so on remand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.3d 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-redman-r-pa-2017.