Commonwealth v. Reddington
This text of 367 A.2d 231 (Commonwealth v. Reddington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Now, this 17th day of November 1976, the Petition for Allocatur is granted. The orders entered in the Superior Court and in the trial court are both vacated, Pa.Super., 361 A.2d 760, and the record is remanded to the trial court for further consideration of the district attorney’s petition filed pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(c) requesting an extension of time in which to commence trial, in light of our recent decisions in Commonwealth v. Mayfield, 469 Pa. 214, 364 A.2d 1345 (1976) and Commonwealth v. Shelton, 469 Pa. 8, 364 A.2d 694 (1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
367 A.2d 231, 469 Pa. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-reddington-pa-1976.