Commonwealth v. Rash, C., Pet
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 95 WM 2016 : Respondent : : : v. : : : CHRISTIAN RASH, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation
is not permitted).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Rash, C., Pet, (Pa. 2016).
Commonwealth v. Rash, C., Pet (Commonwealth v. Rash, C., Pet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)