Commonwealth v. Ransom
This text of 85 A.2d 125 (Commonwealth v. Ransom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The defendant was found guilty of rape and robbery, and from sentence and judgment thereon he appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and thence to this Court.
This appeal revolves around the troublesome subject of the admissibility of evidence of allegedly similar and related crimes, viz., evidence of attempted rape and robbery, several hours, and of rape forty-eight hours prior to the commission of this crime.
The case was fairly and ably tried by Judge John J. Lamoree, and we find no merit in any of the defendant’s contentions nor any reversible error. The judgment is affirmed on the able opinion of President Judge Rhodes which is reported in 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 306, 82 A. 2d 547.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 A.2d 125, 369 Pa. 153, 1952 Pa. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-ransom-pa-1952.