Commonwealth v. Ramos

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Ramos

62 A.3d 373, 619 Pa. 344, 2013 WL 709111, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 341

DecidedFebruary 27, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 62 A.3d 373 (Commonwealth v. Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Ramos, 62 A.3d 373, 619 Pa. 344, 2013 WL 709111, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 341 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, with slight rephrasing, is:

Did the Superior Court panel’s decision affirming the trial court’s judgment of sentence impermissibly impose a five (5) year mandatory minimum prison sentence pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. Section 9712.1 in violation of Pennsylvania’s indeterminate sentencing scheme mandated by 42 Pa.C.S.A. Section 9756(b), when the maximum sentence for the conviction is also five (5) years?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, with slight rephrasing, is:

Did the Superior Court panel’s decision affirming the trial court’s judgment of sentence impermissibly impose a five (5) year mandatory minimum prison sentence pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. Section 9712.1 in violation of Pennsylvania’s indeterminate sentencing scheme mandated by 42 Pa.C.S.A. Section 9756(b), when the maximum sentence for the conviction is also five (5) years?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.3d 373, 619 Pa. 344, 2013 WL 709111, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-ramos-pa-2013.