Commonwealth v. Raban

52 A.3d 222, 616 Pa. 590, 2012 WL 3818989, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2072
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 4, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court correctly held that Section 305(a)(1) of the Dog Law, 3 P.S. § 459-305(a)(l), is a strict liability offense. In briefing this issue, the parties are directed to include a discussion within the framework of the Statutory Construction Act, 1 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 1501 et seq., as to whether the General Assembly intended Section 305(a)(1) to be a strict liability offense.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Raban, 52 A.3d 222, 616 Pa. 590, 2012 WL 3818989, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2072 (Pa. 2012).

52 A.3d 222 (Commonwealth v. Raban) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Raban
85 A.3d 467 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)