Commonwealth v. Quann

General Court of Virginia

Commonwealth v. Quann

2 Va. 89

DecidedNovember 15, 1817

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Va. 89 (Commonwealth v. Quann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Quann, 2 Va. 89 (Va. Super. Ct. 1817).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

‘1 The Court is of opinion and doth decide, that the words which,' it appears by the Record in this Case, the Counsel for the said William Quann, moved *to have expunged from the said Record, ought to be expunged therefrom. The Court doth also decide by the unanimous opinion of the Judges present, that the plea of autrefoits acquit in the said Record set forth, doth not, in point of Raw, offer any bar to the prosecution founded on the Indictment in this Case, and therefore, that it ought to be overruled.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

‘1 The Court is of opinion and doth decide, that the words which,' it appears by the Record in this Case, the Counsel for the said William Quann, moved *to have expunged from the said Record, ought to be expunged therefrom. The Court doth also decide by the unanimous opinion of the Judges present, that the plea of autrefoits acquit in the said Record set forth, doth not, in point of Raw, offer any bar to the prosecution founded on the Indictment in this Case, and therefore, that it ought to be overruled.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Va. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-quann-vagensess-1817.