Commonwealth v. Qualls

932 A.2d 871, 593 Pa. 511, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1804
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 30, 2007·No. Appeal 1062 MAL 2005·Published

Opinion

*512 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the mandatory provisions of 42 Pa.C.S.A. [§ ]9712 should apply when the jury, responding to a special interrogatory, finds as a fact that the defendant did not possess a weapon[?]

The Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for re-sentencing. See Commonwealth v. Dickson, 591 Pa. 364, 918 A.2d 95 (2007) (holding that the mandatory minimum sentence enhancement of § 9712 does not apply to an unarmed accomplice).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Qualls, 932 A.2d 871, 593 Pa. 511, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1804 (Pa. 2007).

932 A.2d 871 (Commonwealth v. Qualls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Dickson
918 A.2d 95 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)